https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/mh17-vliegramp/presentaties/presentation-joint/Phiến quân bắn thì có lẽ đúng, nhưng kẻ dụ cho phiến quân bắn là không quân Ukraine bay gần máy bay dân dụng MH17. Đội điều tra đã cố tình lờ chi tiết này. Kẻ cố tình dẫn dụ cho đối phương bắn nhầm mới là kẻ cần lên án. Chẳng thế mà một luật sư của Đức đã cho rằng Ukraine phải chịu trách nhiệm khi cho phép máy bay dân dụng bay vào khu vực chiến sự.
"
First, the possibility that flight MH17 had been shot down by another airplane equipped with a weapon system. This is the air-to-air scenario.
In the investigation so far, we have come to the conclusion that we can also rule out the air-to-air scenario.
What follows is the explanation about how we reached that conclusion.
If flight MH17 would have been shot down by another airplane, this plane would have been shown on the radar images. There has been quite some discussion about the radar data. The JIT has acquired sufficient and crucial radar images. These images were made available to the JIT by both Ukraine and the Russian Federation. Recently, through intensive investigation, the JIT found another video file containing relevant primary radar data of the area which had been recorded by a mobile radar in Ukraine. At the time, this radar was used to test new software. Although it had a limited range, it still detected flight MH17 and this completes the image further.
As far as we are concerned, the discussion about the radar images can be concluded. Today we wish to emphasize that the material that we now have is more than sufficient to draw conclusions in the criminal investigation. For building up a solid criminal file, it will not be necessary to gather more evidentiary material.
In addition to the radar images that we have, witnesses have been heard, such as the air traffic controllers who were working at that time; the JIT has an audio file of the conversations between the Ukrainian air traffic controllers and the airplanes that passed through the Ukrainian airspace on 17 July 2014, including flight MH17.
All these data together provide a sufficiently complete picture of the air traffic in the direct vicinity of flight MH17 and based on this picture the JIT concludes that there was no other aircraft flying in the vicinity of flight MH17 that could have shot it down. This conclusion in itself can already rule out that scenario.
The Russian Federation mentioned last week that they have found ‘new’ primary radar images. Based on those images even the Russian Federation concludes that there was no second airplane that could have shot down MH17."
Nghĩa là theo UBDT tại thời điểm MH17 bị bắn hạ không có máy bay thứ hai. Đây là kết luận tổng hợp từ nhiều nguồn kể cả từ chính phủ Nga.